US 18/412,907 (GN204) OA response draft.
· Rejection §103 obviousness — cited refs D1+D2 combined
· Claims 1 & 5 amendments — dosage limitation added
· Due 2026-08-12 (D-28) — added to deadline calendar

Rather than fearing being replaced by technology, make AI your strongest tool.
Leave repetitive work and manual errors to Patif, and grow as an irreplaceable expert.
As AI evolves, Patif keeps evolving too.
Promotional mail is filtered out, and the emails to check and their key requests are surfaced first.
Of 2 rejections, inventive step on claim 1 is key; reply due Sep 8 (D-14)
Mail history organized by case, automatically. When the person in charge changes, no one starts from the beginning.
1. 2026.08.12 / Minseo Park → Gildong Hong
•Sent an opinion on the new "AI Focus Coach" filing, noting the case is viewed as an AI-implemented invention.
•Requested focus criteria, scoring method, feedback-based adjustments, and reference papers / prior art for the filing.
2. 2026.08.12 / Minseo Park → Gildong Hong
•Re-sent the filing guidance letter and asked for confirmation.
3. 2026.08.18 / Gildong Hong → Minseo Park
•Sent the focus criteria and scoring materials and asked whether to request examination at filing.
4. 2026.08.19 / Minseo Park → Gildong Hong
•Requested review of the "AI Focus Coach" draft specification, asking for a reply by Sep 12.
•Confirmed the exam request will be filed together with the application.
Specifications, drawings, review sheets. Without opening them one by one, you know what each file contains and which one to look at first.
RE: "AI Focus Coach" draft specification review
3 attachments
Hello, please find attached the draft specification materials you requested.
The drawings and prior art review sheet are attached as well.
Check this file first
AIFocusCoach_Spec_Draft_v3.docx
Claim 1 terminology differs from the description; fix before filing.
2)Drawings_Fig1-8.pdfCheck
8 drawings. Fig.7 is not referenced in the specification.
3)PriorArt_Review.xlsxReference
6 prior art references; KR 10-2021-0088xxx is closest to claim 1.
One request and the body is drafted to your registered templates and writing rules.
Write your own, or start from an AI draft.
Dear Mr. Hong,
We confirm receipt of the filing materials.
Please confirm the applicant and inventor details, and let us know whether to request examination.
We will advise on annuity management after registration.
Best regards, Minseo Park, Haeran IP Law Firm
Dear Mr. Hong,
We confirm receipt of the filing materials.
Please confirm the applicant and inventor details,
and let us know whether to request examination.
Best regards, Minseo Park, Haeran IP Law Firm
Cases, mail and deadlines found with one line of conversation. Changes are applied only after the person in charge approves.
US 18/412,907 (GN204) OA response draft.
· Rejection §103 obviousness — cited refs D1+D2 combined
· Claims 1 & 5 amendments — dosage limitation added
· Due 2026-08-12 (D-28) — added to deadline calendar
Message Patif...
The AI secretary finds what needs doing first, and sends anything that needs your review up for approval.
Secretary Home · Tue, Sep 29
No reports yet
Approval · Forward OA notice mail
Mail · Forward · drafted by secretary at 08:40
An Office Action arrived for your case. Forwarding it to you.
Case: 10-2023-0123456 · AI Focus Coach
Client: Ganada Tech Inc.
Response due: Nov 28 (D-60)
Official KIPO and KIPRIS data is linked to your cases, so case details stay accurate and every change is updated with its source.

Domestic and PCT filing forms are generated straight from the case data. Just upload the bibliographic form and its details go into that case.
Register applications and trials you want to follow, and get an alert whenever something changes.
Track tasks and each owner’s progress from filing to registration, and create report emails and invoices with one click.
Every patent, utility model, design and trademark case is sorted by nearest deadline, so today’s work comes first.
No splitting and re-merging. Upload the file and the whole document is translated to one consistent standard.
Record each client’s requests and cautions once, and they come up first when you open that client’s case.
Store each client’s fees and rules once, and the agreed terms apply exactly, every time you write an invoice.
| Code | Fee item | Unit | Base rate | Type | Active | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAT-BASE | Patent filing base fee | Flat | 1,200,000 | Service | Active | |
| PAT-CLM | Additional claim | Each | 50,000 | Service | Active | |
| PAT-SPEC | Specification drafting | Per page | 30,000 | Service | Active | |
| PAT-OA | OA response | Flat | 800,000 | Service | Active | |
| PAT-GOV-FIL | Filing official fee | Flat | 46,000 | Official | Active | |
| PAT-GOV-EXM | Exam request official fee | Flat | 143,000 | Official | Active |
Client rate — Ganada Tech Inc.
Issued invoices become receivables automatically, with each client’s payment status and overdue days at a glance.
Keep the details of the agent handling each overseas filing on the case, with their invoices stored as case documents.
Key actions go through your firm’s own approval line, and run as soon as they are finally approved.
Choose which menus admins, members and viewers can use, so everyone sees only the screens they need.
Menu permissions
Manage menus, groups and user permissions in one place.
Roles
Select a role to set permissions
Menu access
11 menus selected10 menus selected9 menus selected
Task assignment and access control for growing firms are on the way, rolling out step by step.

Repetition and errors to Patif,
your expertise to the MAX
No complicated onboarding, start free today
patif.io
Start now with QR